This week's internet news has been dominated by the blocking of an image and associated text on a Wikipedia page with an image of an album cover by the German heavy metal band The Scorpions. The blocking was instigated by the Internet Watch Foundation, a self-appointed body who make ISPs aware of illegal images on the web and ask them to take appropriate steps to block access. This has caused outrage as it is the first time that the IWF has requested a block on such a popular and important site as Wikipedia.
The result has been precisely the opposite of what the IWF intended and they have been forced to issue a
statement and climbdown.
I for one would not in any way decry the important work that the IWF does; but I do think there are parallels to be found with the way education censors the web. The main issue for me is the lack of accountability, the IWF is a self-appointed body with its own modus operandii. This seems to be the case with most English Local Authorities where the filters are in the hands of local tech support teams. I am not aware of any examples where teachers actually have an input into the framing of filtering policies applied by local authorities (please let me know of examples of good practice). Some examples I've seen include:
- Blocking of all mp3 files regardless of source;
- Blocking of some slideshow generation sites, but not others;
- Blocking of schools blogsites;
- Widespread blocking of social media tools such as Delicious.
And there are many more.
I appreciate that there is a need for some level of filter to block the obvious but, in many cases I believe that filters are preventing excellence and innovation in teaching. How, for example, could any teacher podcast in a local authority which blanket bans all mp3s? The lack of consistency is the most frustrating thing, not just between authorities, but within an authority. Why is one blogging tool blocked, yet another is freely available?
Most local authorities (but not all - you have to ask why not?) have a contact number or email address on their "block" pages for teachers to contact the person responsible for checking sites, but again the speed of response varies dramatically from "I'll have a look now," to weeks later. In the latter scenario is it any wonder that teachers give up trying to innovate with internet tools?